Interventions for increasing the proportion of health professionals practising in rural and other underserved areas
- 21 January 2009
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 1,p. CD005314
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd005314.pub2
Abstract
The inequitable distribution of health professionals, within and between countries, poses an important obstacle to the achievement of optimal attainable health for all. To assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing the proportion of health professionals working in rural and other underserved areas. We searched the specialised register of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (up to July 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (up to July 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2007), EMBASE (1988 to July 2007), CINAHL (1982 to July 2007) and LILACS (up to July 2007). We also searched reference lists of all papers and relevant reviews identified, and contacted authors of relevant papers regarding any further published or unpublished work. Randomised controlled trials, controlled trials (not strictly randomised), controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating the effects of various interventions (e.g. educational, financial or regulatory strategies) on the recruitment and/or retention of health professionals in under-served areas. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts obtained from the search in order to identify potentially relevant studies. No studies met the inclusion criteria. There are no studies in which bias and confounding are minimised to support any of the interventions that have been implemented to address the inequitable distribution of health care professionals. Well-designed studies are needed to confirm or refute findings of various observational studies regarding educational, financial, regulatory and supportive interventions that may influence health care professionals' choice to practice in underserved areas. Governments and educators should ensure that where interventions are implemented this is done within the context of a well-planned study so that the true effects of these measures on recruitment and long term retention can be determined in various settings.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Not enough there, too many here: understanding geographical imbalances in the distribution of the health workforceHuman Resources for Health, 2006
- The Roles of Nature and Nurture in the Recruitment and Retention of Primary Care Physicians in Rural AreasAcademic Medicine, 2002
- A longitudinal, national study of the effect of implementing a required third-year family practice clerkship or a department of family medicine on the selection of family medicine by medical studentsAcademic Medicine, 1999
- Compulsory medical service in Ecuador: the physician's perspectiveSocial Science & Medicine, 1998
- A survey of graduates in practice from the University of New Mexicoʼs conventional and community-oriented, problem-based tracksAcademic Medicine, 1996
- The effects of medical school curricula, faculty role models, and biomedical research support on choice of generalist physician careersAcademic Medicine, 1995
- Influence of longitudinal primary care training on medical studentsʼ specialty choicesAcademic Medicine, 1993
- Effect of a year-long primary care clerkship on graduatesʼ selection of family practice residenciesAcademic Medicine, 1991
- Recruitment and Retention of Rural Physicians: Issues for the 1990s*The Journal of Rural Health, 1990
- Impact of participation in a family practice track program on student career decisionsAcademic Medicine, 1982