Heat and moisture exchangers in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: A plea for an independent assessment of their performance
Open Access
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 31 (3) , 699-704
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000050443.45863.f5
Abstract
To determine whether use of a hygroscopic and hydrophobic heat and moisture exchanger (HME) for 7 days without change affects its efficiency in long-term, mechanically ventilated, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study comparing two combined HMEs. Medical intensive care unit at a university teaching hospital. Long-term, mechanically ventilated, COPD patients compared with non-COPD patients. In the first part of the study, COPD patients were studied with the Hygroster HME changed once a week. For the second part, the Hygroster was assessed in non-COPD patients and compared with the Hygrobac HME used in COPD and non-COPD patients for 1 wk without change. Devices could be changed if hygrometric measurements indicated insufficient humidity delivery. Daily measurements were recorded for inspired gas temperature and relative and absolute humidity. Ventilatory variables, clinical indicators of efficient humidification, were also recorded. No tracheal tube occlusion occurred. However, contrary to the manufacturer advertisement, the Hygroster experienced surprisingly low values for absolute humidity in both COPD and non-COPD patients. Such events did not occur with the Hygrobac. Absolute humidity with the Hygroster was constantly and significantly lower during the 7-day study period than with the Hygrobac. Absolute humidity measured in COPD patients was identical to that measured in the rest of the study population with both HMEs. Manufacturer specifications and bedside measurements of absolute humidity differed considerably for the Hygroster, which in certain instances did not achieve efficient humidification in both COPD and non-COPD patients. This did not occur with the Hygrobac, which performed well throughout the 7-day period in both COPD and non-COPD patients. Our results speak for independent and evaluation of HMEs.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ventilator circuit and secretion management strategies: A Franco-Canadian surveyCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing an Extended-Use Hygroscopic Condenser Humidifier With Heated-Water Humidification in Mechanically Ventilated PatientsChest, 1998
- Clinical utility of hygroscopic heat and moisture exchangers in intensive care patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- Safety of Combined Heat and Moisture Exchanger Filters in Long-term Mechanical VentilationChest, 1997
- Comparing Two Heat and Moisture Exchangers With One Vaporizing Humidifier in Patients With Minute Ventilation Greater Than 10 L/minChest, 1995
- Comparative Evaluation of Three Heat and Moisture Exchangers During Short-term Postoperative Mechanical VentilationChest, 1993
- Performance Evaluation of Three Vaporizing Humidifiers and Two Heat and Moisture Exchangers in Patients with Minute Ventilation <10 L/minChest, 1992
- An evaluation of the heat and moisture exchange performance of four ventilator circuit filtersIntensive Care Medicine, 1992
- Humidity and the Anesthetized PatientAnesthesiology, 1979
- TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY AND MUCUS FLOW IN THE INTUBATED TRACHEABritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1974