Relation of Mean Right Atrial Pressure to Echocardiographic and Doppler Parameters of Right Atrial and Right Ventricular Function
- 15 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 93 (6) , 1160-1169
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.93.6.1160
Abstract
Background A paucity of data exists as to the relation of mean right atrial pressure (RAP) to Doppler parameters of right atrial and ventricular filling. Furthermore, whether echocardiographic parameters of right atrial and right ventricular function and inferior vena cava improve the relation of Doppler filling dynamics with RAP has not been explored. Methods and Results Doppler and echocardiographic studies were performed simultaneously with measurements of mean RAP in consecutive patients who either had a central venous catheter in the Intensive Care Unit or underwent catheterization of the right side of the heart. The initial population consisted of 35 patients with a mean age (±SD) of 60±15 years; 34% were on mechanical ventilation. Mean RAP averaged 9±5.7 mm Hg (range, 2 to 28 mm Hg). Among tricuspid inflow parameters, the strongest relation with RAP was observed with the ratio of early to late velocity ( r =.66). For hepatic venous flow, systolic filling wave indexes had the best relation with atrial pressure, the highest being for systolic filling fraction ( r =−.86). Weaker relations were noted with the use of right atrial volumes, right ventricular function, and inferior vena caval diameters. The addition of any of these variables did not improve the relation of systolic filling fraction with RAP. The regression equation (RAP=21.6−24 systolic filling fraction) was tested prospectively in the estimation of atrial pressure in 50 patients. The correlation coefficient was .89 in the prospective group and .88 in the total group of 85 patients. The mean difference between predicted and actual pressures in the whole population was −0.2±2.6 mm Hg. The sensitivity and specificity for mean RAP>8 mm Hg were 86% and 92%, respectively. Conclusions Among echocardiographic and Doppler parameters of right atrial and right ventricular function, hepatic venous flow dynamics relate best to mean atrial pressure and can be used clinically to estimate mean RAP.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of respiratory variations in pulmonary venous flowPublished by Elsevier ,2010
- Non invasive estimation of mean right atrial pressure utilizing the 2D-Echo transverse diameter of the left hepatic veinThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 1992
- Impact of Hemodialysis on Left and Right Ventricular Doppler Diastolic Filling IndicesThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1992
- Noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure from the inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cavaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Effects of sample volume location, imaging view, heart rate and age on tricuspid velocimetry in normal subjectsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by pulsed doppler echocardiography of the hepatic veinThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Assessment of Diastolic Function of the Heart: Background and Current Applications of Doppler Echocardiography. Part II. Clinical StudiesMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1989
- Quantification of atrial contribution to left ventricular filling by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and the effect of age in normal and diseased heartsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Detection and evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation using a real-time, two-dimensional, color-coded, Doppler flow imaging system: Comparison with contrast two-dimensional echocardiography and right ventriculographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- Continuous wave doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: A simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patientsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985