The Optimal Timing of Greenhouse Gas Emission Abatement, Individual Rationality and Intergenerational Equity
Preprint
- 1 January 1998
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
This paper explores the relationship between rationality and equity in an intergenerational context of greenhouse gas emission reduction. It is shown that the least-cost trajectory to a constraint on cumulative emissions implies an upward-sloping emission reduction effort, whether technological development is exogenous or endogenous (either investments in research, development and demonstration or learning-by-doing). The least-cost trajectory, however, also implies in most cases that generations in the further future face higher relative costs than do generations in the nearer future. Cost-effectiveness thus may well violate intergenerational equity and rationality of future decision makers. More equitable solutions would lead to a relative shift of abatement effort to the near future, although emission reduction would still be increasing over time. In all cases, technological development in the earlier decades is very important.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Technological change and the timing of mitigation measuresEnergy Economics, 1998
- On the difference in impact of two almost identical climate change scenariosEnergy Policy, 1998
- Technologies, energy systems and the timing of CO2 emissions abatementEnergy Policy, 1997
- On stabilizing CO2 concentrations — cost-effective emission reduction strategiesPublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- International CO2 emissions targets and timetables: An analysis of the AOSIS proposalEnvironmental Modeling & Assessment, 1996
- Emission scenarios and global climate protectionGlobal Environmental Change, 1996
- Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrationsNature, 1996
- The Greenhouse Debate: Economic Efficiency, Burden Sharing and Hedging StrategiesThe Energy Journal, 1995