Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences
Top Cited Papers
- 10 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 463 (7284) , 1079-1083
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08742
Abstract
The remarkable antiquity, diversity and ecological significance of arthropods have inspired numerous attempts to resolve their deep phylogenetic history, but the results of two decades of intensive molecular phylogenetics have been mixed. The discovery that terrestrial insects (Hexapoda) are more closely related to aquatic Crustacea than to the terrestrial centipedes and millipedes (Myriapoda) was an early, if exceptional, success. More typically, analyses based on limited samples of taxa and genes have generated results that are inconsistent, weakly supported and highly sensitive to analytical conditions. Here we present strongly supported results from likelihood, Bayesian and parsimony analyses of over 41 kilobases of aligned DNA sequence from 62 single-copy nuclear protein-coding genes from 75 arthropod species. These species represent every major arthropod lineage, plus five species of tardigrades and onychophorans as outgroups. Our results strongly support Pancrustacea (Hexapoda plus Crustacea) but also strongly favour the traditional morphology-based Mandibulata (Myriapoda plus Pancrustacea) over the molecule-based Paradoxopoda (Myriapoda plus Chelicerata). In addition to Hexapoda, Pancrustacea includes three major extant lineages of 'crustaceans', each spanning a significant range of morphological disparity. These are Oligostraca (ostracods, mystacocarids, branchiurans and pentastomids), Vericrustacea (malacostracans, thecostracans, copepods and branchiopods) and Xenocarida (cephalocarids and remipedes). Finally, within Pancrustacea we identify Xenocarida as the long-sought sister group to the Hexapoda, a result confirming that 'crustaceans' are not monophyletic. These results provide a statistically well-supported phylogenetic framework for the largest animal phylum and represent a step towards ending the often-heated, century-long debate on arthropod relationships.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phylogenomics Revives Traditional Views on Deep Animal RelationshipsCurrent Biology, 2009
- Resolving Arthropod Phylogeny: Exploring Phylogenetic Signal within 41 kb of Protein-Coding Nuclear Gene SequenceSystematic Biology, 2008
- Evaluating the robustness of phylogenetic methods to among-site variability in substitution processesPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2008
- Revealing pancrustacean relationships: Phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal protein genes places Collembola (springtails) in a monophyletic Hexapoda and reinforces the discrepancy between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markersBMC Ecology and Evolution, 2008
- Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial protein coding genes confirms the reciprocal paraphyly of Hexapoda and CrustaceaBMC Ecology and Evolution, 2007
- Myriapod Monophyly and Relationships Among Myriapod Classes Based on Nearly Complete 28S and 18S rDNA SequencesZoological Science, 2006
- MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignmentNucleic Acids Research, 2005
- Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisonsJournal of Molecular Biology, 2001
- Using Evolutionary Trees in Protein Secondary Structure Prediction and Other Comparative Sequence AnalysesJournal of Molecular Biology, 1996
- The genetic data environment an expandable GUI for multiple sequence analysisBioinformatics, 1994