Is intent‐to‐treat analysis always (ever) enough?
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 54 (2) , 203-211
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01628.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Causal Effects in Clinical and Epidemiological Studies Via Potential Outcomes: Concepts and Analytical ApproachesAnnual Review of Public Health, 2000
- Bayesian inference for causal effects in randomized experiments with noncomplianceThe Annals of Statistics, 1997
- Multiple Imputation after 18+ YearsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Role of Patient Compliance in Clinical PharmacokineticsClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1994
- Analysis of clinical trials by treatment actually received: Is it really an option?Statistics in Medicine, 1991
- Compliance as an Explanatory Variable in Clinical TrialsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1991
- On estimating efficacy from clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: An updateStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- Causal Inference in Retrospective StudiesEvaluation Review, 1988
- A New Design for Randomized Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979