Why male butterflies are non-mimetic: natural selection, sexual selection, group selection, modification and sieving*
Open Access
- 1 December 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Vol. 10 (4) , 385-432
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1978.tb00023.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Maintenance of Non-Mimetic Forms in a Dimorphic Batesian Mimic SpeciesEvolution, 1976
- Theoretical genetics of batesian mimicry II. Evolution of supergenesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1975
- Theoretical genetics of batesian mimicry I. Single-locus modelsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1975
- Reversed Sex-Limited Mimicry in a BeetleEvolution, 1975
- Saturniid Moths as Mimics: An Alternative Interpretation of Attempts to Demonstrate Mimetic Advantage in NatureEvolution, 1975
- Two Thousand Generations of Hybridisation in a Heliconius ButterflyEvolution, 1971
- Natural Selection For and Against a Polymorphism Which Interacts with SexEvolution, 1968
- Conditions for Stable Polymorphism at an Autosomal LocusNature, 1962
- Investigations into the courtship behaviour of the male of Hypolimnas misippus L. (Lepidoptera, nymphalidae), with special reference to the role of visual stimuliThe British Journal of Animal Behaviour, 1957
- On the courtship behaviour of Hypolimnas misippus L., (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae), with notes on the mimetic association with Danaus chrysippus L., (Lepidoptera, Danaidae)The British Journal of Animal Behaviour, 1956