Power Input During Flight of the Fish Crow, Corvus Ossifragus
Open Access
- 1 April 1973
- journal article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 58 (2) , 401-410
- https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.58.2.401
Abstract
1. The fish crow and the laughing gull, although similar in body mass, differ in wing morphology and wingbeat frequency. We studied the power input during sustained flight in the fish crow for comparison with data reported for the laughing gull. 2. Two fish crows (mean mass 275 g) were trained to fly in a wind-tunnel for 15-20 min at air speeds of 7-11 m s-1 in descending flight at angles of 2°, 4° and 6° relative to horizontal. Oxygen consumption was determined by analysing air sampled through a mask and attached trailing air tube. Power input was defined as the rate of metabolic energy expenditure calculated from rate of oxygen consumption. The results were corrected for the drag of the mask and tube, and power input for horizontal flight was calculated. 3. Power input varied little with air speed, but decreased with increasing angle of descent. Minimum power input for horizontal flight (0.083 W g-1) was 6.4 times greater than mean resting power input. During horizontal flight, power input for the fish crow exceeded by about one-third that for the laughing gull.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metabolism during flight in the laughing gull, Larus atricillaAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1972
- Scaling of energetic cost of running to body size in mammalsAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1970
- Energetic cost of locomotion in animalsComparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 1970
- Aerodynamics of Gliding Flight in A Falcon and Other BirdsJournal of Experimental Biology, 1970
- A Wind-Tunnel Study of Gliding Flight in the Pigeon Columba LiviaJournal of Experimental Biology, 1968
- Respiratory Exchange and Evaporative Water Loss in the Flying BudgerigarJournal of Experimental Biology, 1968
- Physiological adjustments of the budgerygah (Melopsittacus undulatus) to dehydrating conditionsComparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 1967
- Oxygen Consumption of Torpid, Resting, Active, and Flying HummingbirdsPhysiological Zoology, 1963
- Biophysics of Bird FlightScience, 1960