How to Resolve an Ethical Dilemma Concerning Randomized Clinical Trials
- 26 August 1999
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 341 (9) , 691-693
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199908263410912
Abstract
An apparent ethical dilemma arises when physicians consider enrolling their patients in randomized clinical trials. Suppose that a randomized clinical trial comparing two treatments is in progress, and a physician has an opinion about which treatment is better. The physician has a duty to promote the patient's best medical interests and therefore seems to be obliged to advise the patient to receive the treatment that the physician prefers. This duty creates a barrier to the enrollment of patients in randomized clinical trials.110 Two strategies are often used to resolve the dilemma in favor of enrolling patients in clinical trials. . . .Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- COMMUNITY‐EQUIPOISE AND THE ETHICS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALSBioethics, 1995
- Clinical Trials — Are They Ethical?New England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Of Mice but Not MenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The Conflict Between Randomized Clinical Trials and the Therapeutic ObligationJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1986
- Leaving Therapy to ChanceHastings Center Report, 1983
- The Ethics of the Randomized Clinical TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trialsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Clinical Trials: Methods and Ethics Are DebatedScience, 1977
- ETHICS IN COOPERATIVE CLINICAL TRIALSAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1970