Human Dignity, Human Rights, and Political Regimes
- 1 September 1986
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 80 (3) , 801-817
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1960539
Abstract
It is often argued that internationally recognized human rights are common to all cultural traditions and adaptable to a great variety of social structures and political regimes. Such arguments confuse human rights with human dignity. All societies possess conceptions of human dignity, but the conception of human dignity underlying international human rights standards requires a particular type of “liberal” regime. This conclusion is reached through a comparison of the social structures of ideal type liberal, minimal, traditional, communist, corporatist and developmental regimes and their impact on autonomy, equality, privacy, social conflict, and the definition of societal membership.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Concept of Human RightsHuman Rights Quarterly, 1987
- Political Repression in Nineteenth-Century Europe.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1986
- A Matter of PrincipleHuman Rights Quarterly, 1986
- Human Rights and Development in AfricaThe International Journal of African Historical Studies, 1986
- Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign PolicyLaw and Philosophy, 1985
- Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Analytic Critique of Non-Western Conceptions of Human RightsAmerican Political Science Review, 1982
- Human Rights as Natural RightsHuman Rights Quarterly, 1982
- Socialism and the Individual — Rights and FreedomsSoviet Studies in Philosophy, 1979
- Class Struggles in TanzaniaCanadian Journal of African Studies / Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines, 1978
- Still the Century of Corporatism?The Review of Politics, 1974