Nitric Oxide in Chemostat-Cultured Escherichia coli Is Sensed by Fnr and Other Global Regulators: Unaltered Methionine Biosynthesis Indicates Lack of S Nitrosation
Open Access
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Bacteriology
- Vol. 189 (5) , 1845-1855
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01354-06
Abstract
We previously elucidated the global transcriptional responses of Escherichia coli to the nitrosating agent S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) in both aerobic and anaerobic chemostats, demonstrated the expression of nitric oxide (NO)-protective mechanisms, and obtained evidence of critical thiol nitrosation. The present study was the first to examine the transcriptome of NO-exposed E. coli in a chemostat. Using identical conditions, we compared the GSNO stimulon with the stimulon of NO released from two NO donor compounds {3-[2-hydroxy-1-(1-methyl-ethyl)-2-nitrosohydrazino]-1-propanamine (NOC-5) and 3-(2-hydroxy-1-methyl-2-nitrosohydrazino)-N-methyl-1-propanamine (NOC-7)} simultaneously and demonstrated that there were marked differences in the transcriptional responses to these distinct nitrosative stresses. Exposure to NO did not induce met genes, suggesting that, unlike GSNO, NO does not elicit homocysteine S nitrosation and compensatory increases in methionine biosynthesis. After entry into cells, exogenous methionine provided protection from GSNO-mediated killing but not from NO-mediated killing. Anaerobic exposure to NO led to up-regulation of multiple Fnr-repressed genes and down-regulation of Fnr-activated genes, including nrfA, which encodes cytochrome c nitrite reductase, providing strong evidence that there is NO inactivation of Fnr. Other global regulators apparently affected by NO were IscR, Fur, SoxR, NsrR, and NorR. We tried to identify components of the NorR regulon by performing a microarray comparison of NO-exposed wild-type and norR mutant strains; only norVW, encoding the NO-detoxifying flavorubredoxin and its cognate reductase, were unambiguously identified. Mutation of norV or norR had no effect on E. coli survival in mouse macrophages. Thus, GSNO (a nitrosating agent) and NO have distinct cellular effects; NO more effectively interacts with global regulators that mediate adaptive responses to nitrosative stress but does not affect methionine requirements arising from homocysteine nitrosation.Keywords
This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Nitric Oxide-Responsive Regulator NsrR Controls ResDE-Dependent Gene ExpressionJournal of Bacteriology, 2006
- Adaptive response of Yersinia pestis to extracellular effectors of innate immunity during bubonic plagueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Defenses against Oxidative Stress inNeisseria gonorrhoeae: a System Tailored for a Challenging EnvironmentMicrobiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2006
- Global Gene Expression Profiling of the Asymptomatic BacteriuriaEscherichia coliStrain 83972 in the Human Urinary TractInfection and Immunity, 2006
- Dissimilatory Metabolism of Nitrogen Oxides in Bacteria: Comparative Reconstruction of Transcriptional NetworksPLoS Computational Biology, 2005
- Bacterial iron homeostasisPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2003
- NO sensing by FNR: regulation of the Escherichia coli NO-detoxifying flavohaemoglobin, HmpThe EMBO Journal, 2002
- rpoS Mutations and Loss of General Stress Resistance in Escherichia coli Populations as a Consequence of Conflict between Competing Stress ResponsesJournal of Bacteriology, 2002
- The inhibitory effect of nitrite, a stable product of nitric oxide (NO) formation, on arginaseFEBS Letters, 1996
- Regulation and sequence of the structural gene for cytochrome C552 from Escherichia coli: not a hexahaem but a 50kDa tetrahaem nitrite reductaseMolecular Microbiology, 1993