Prioritizing Future Research on Off‐Label Prescribing: Results of a Quantitative Evaluation
- 1 December 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
- Vol. 28 (12) , 1443-1452
- https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.28.12.1443
Abstract
Study Objective. To develop a prioritized list of individual drugs for which future research regarding off‐label uses is warranted.Design. Retrospective, cross‐sectional study.Data Sources. Commercial database that provides ongoing estimates of drug prescribing practices of office‐based physicians in the United States and an Internet database of comprehensive evidence‐based drug information.Measurements and Main Results. The base analyses incorporated three key factors based on the theory of value of information: volume of off‐label use with inadequate evidence, drug safety, and cost and market considerations. Nationally representative prescribing data were used to estimate the number of off‐label drug uses by indication from January 1, 2005‐June 30, 2007, in the United States, and these indications were then categorized according to the adequacy of scientific support. Black‐box warnings and safety alerts, drug cost, date of market entry, and marketing expenditures were also incorporated into the final model to produce a priority score. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying key model parameters. Our findings identified a high volume of off‐label prescribing in the absence of good evidence for a substantial number of drugs, particularly antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytic‐sedatives. Drugs that consistently ranked high in both our base model and sensitivity analyses were quetiapine, warfarin, escitalopram, risperidone, montelukast, bupropion, sertraline, venlafaxine, celecoxib, lisinopril, duloxetine, trazodone, olanzapine, and epoetin alfa.Conclusion. Future research into off‐label drug use should focus on drugs used frequently with inadequate supporting evidence, particularly if further concerns are raised by known safety issues, high drug cost, recent market entry, and extensive marketing. Our quantitative analysis identified particular concerns with the off‐label use of antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs. Targeted research and policy activities on our list of prioritized drugs have high potential value.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Depression treatment during outpatient visits by U.S. children and adolescentsJournal of Adolescent Health, 2005
- An epidemiological investigation of off‐label anticonvulsant drug use in the Georgia Medicaid populationPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2005
- Fluoroquinolone prescribing in the United States: 1995 to 2002The American Journal of Medicine, 2005
- A Modified Outpatient Prescription Form to Reduce Prescription ErrorsThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, 2004
- ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial InfarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004
- The underutilization of cardiacmedications of proven benefit, 1990 to 2002Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Regulatory and reimbursement issues in treating patients with immune-mediated neuropathiesNeurology, 2002
- Unlicensed and off label prescribing of drugs in general practiceArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2000
- Bayesian approaches to the value of information: implications for the regulation of new pharmaceuticalsHealth Economics, 1999
- Post-marketing studies of drug efficacy: Why?The American Journal of Medicine, 1985