Somatotopic Organization and Response Characteristics of Dorsal Horn Neurons in the Cervical Spinal Cord of the Cat
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Somatosensory Research
- Vol. 3 (4) , 323-338
- https://doi.org/10.3109/07367228609144591
Abstract
Somatotopic organization was examined for 203 dorsal horn cells in spinal segments C6 and C7 of chloralose-anesthetized cats. The ventral paw and toe area were represented medial to a smaller area with input from the dorsal paw. Representation of the ventromedial forelimb was rostral to that of the paw, while the shoulder and dorsolateral limb were represented caudal to it. In 13 out of 22 electrode tracks in which three or more cells were found, the location of receptive fields progressively changed for successively recorded cells. Receptive fields on the paw were closer together and overlapped more than those on the proximal limb. Receptive fields that included glabrous skin were found for only 7 of 203 cells; all were located in the medial third of the C7 dorsal horn. It appears that glabrous skin is underrepresented in the dorsal horn; this may be compensated for at higher levels by input from the lemniscal system. The response characteristics of 172 dorsal horn neurons were examined. Of these units, 135 (78%) had cutaneous receptive fields. An additional 37 cells (22%) responded to manipulation of muscle or tendon and were classified as deep (D) cells. The cells with cutaneous receptive fields were classified as low-threshold (LT) cells (38%), high-threshold (HT) cells (20%), and wide-dynamic-range (WDR) cells (20%). Alternatively, using cluster analysis, 57 cells with cutaneous receptive fields were classified as one of five mechanical types. Type 1 cells responded primarily to low-threshold input, while the other four types fired in characteristic patterns in response to a combination of innocuous and noxious stimuli. LT cells were located more superficially in the spinal cord than the other classes; their average depth below the cord surface was 1.9 mm. WDR cells (mean = 2.1 mm) were located below the LT cells and above the HT and D cells (mean = 2.6 mm).This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cutaneous receptive fields of somatic and viscerosomatic neurones in the thoracic spinal cord of the catJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1985
- A simple and rapid method for making carbon fiber microelectrodesJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 1981
- Projections from Pacinian corpuscles and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors of glabrous skin to the cat's spinal cord.The Journal of Physiology, 1980
- Carbon fibre microelectrodesJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 1979
- Responses of spinocervical tract neurones to noxious stimulation of the skin.The Journal of Physiology, 1977
- Somatotopic representation of hindlimb skin in cat dorsal hornJournal of Neurophysiology, 1975
- Cells of origin of the spinocervical tract in the monkeyExperimental Neurology, 1974
- Responses of spinocervical tract neurones to natural stimulation of identified cutaneous receptorsExperimental Brain Research, 1969
- The transmission of information in primary receptor neurones and second-order neurones of a phasic systemThe Journal of Physiology, 1962
- A group of neurones in the dorsal horn associated with cutaneous mechanoreceptorsThe Journal of Physiology, 1961