Capital, Labor, and the Firm: A Study of German Codetermination
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the European Economic Association
- Vol. 2 (5) , 863-905
- https://doi.org/10.1162/1542476042782260
Abstract
Under the German corporate governance system of codetermination, employees are legally allocated control rights over corporate assets through seats on the supervisory board—that is, the board of nonexecutive directors. The supervisory board oversees the management board— the board of executive directors—approves or rejects its decisions, and appoints its members and sets their salaries. We empirically investigate the implications of this sort of labor participation in corporate decision making. We find that companies with equal representation of employees and shareholders on the supervisory board trade at a 31% stock market discount as compared with companies where employee representatives fill only one-third of the supervisory board seats. We show that under equal representation, management board compensation provides incentives that are not conducive to furthering shareholders' interests, possibly because labor maximizes a different objective function than shareholders. We document that, under equal representation, companies have longer payrolls than their one-third representation peers have. Finally, we provide evidence that shareholders respond to the allocation of control rights to labor by linking supervisory board compensation to firm performance and by leveraging up the firm. (JEL: G32, G34)Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysisPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Codetermination as a strategic advantage?International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001
- Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade‐Off between Liquidity and Control?The Journal of Finance, 1998
- Capital Structure as an Optimal Contract Between Employees and InvestorsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Specific capital and unemployment: Measuring the costs and consequences of job lossCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1990
- Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local FittingJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1988
- Regression by local fittingJournal of Econometrics, 1988
- The Union Impact on Profits: Evidence from Industry Price-Cost Margin DataJournal of Labor Economics, 1986
- Tobin's q, Unionization, and the Concentration-Profits RelationshipThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1984
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980