Growth Politics and Downtown Development
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Affairs Quarterly
- Vol. 28 (1) , 3-21
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004208169202800101
Abstract
Urban areas dominated by growth do not follow the same progrowth strategies for development. Some cities have adopted development policies that seek to redistribute the costs and benefits of downtown economic development. This is not necessarily, however, an antigrowth strategy but is, rather, a progressive growth agenda. In this comparative study, the characteristics of growth politics are examined through downtown development strategies that affect commercial development and neighborhood housing. The distribution of costs and benefits of such development to commercial and residential sectors indicates different public/private relationships that can be found within growth politics.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Growth Politics in Tampa and Hillsborough County: Strains in the Privatistic RegimesJournal of Urban Affairs, 1991
- Type II Policy and Mandated Benefits in Economic DevelopmentUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1990
- Privatism and the Limits of Local Economic Development PolicyUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1989
- Urban Political Regime Formation: A Study in ContrastJournal of Urban Affairs, 1989
- Competition for Economic Development among Southeastern CitiesUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1988
- The Dependent CityUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1987
- Twentieth Century Urban RegimesJournal of Urban Affairs, 1985
- The Politics of Profit and the Geography of GrowthUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1983
- A Pragmatic Econometric Approach to Assessing Economic Impacts of Growth or Decline in Urban AreasLand Economics, 1978
- The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of PlaceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1976