A COMPARISON OF PIPERACILLIN, CEPHALOTHIN AND CEFOXITIN IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE INFECTIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY
- 1 November 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 163 (5) , 421-427
Abstract
A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial was initiated to compare the safety and efficacy of piperacillin, cephalothin and cefoxitin in the prophylactic treatment of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. The total dose of each antibiotic was 6 grams given in three equally divided doses. A satisfactory prophylactic response was obtained in 143 of 151 (95 per cent) patients treated with piperacillin, in 82 of 87 (94 per cent) patients treated with cephalothin and in 57 of 60 (95 per cent) patients treated with cefoxitin. The pooled data indicated that the piperacillin treatment group did not differ from the combined cephalosporin treatment groups with respect to prophylactic response, presence of febrile morbidity, fever index, duration of postoperative hospitalization and incidence of reported adverse experiences.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative study of piperacillin versus cefoxitin in the treatment of obstetric and gynecologic infectionsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1983
- Piperacillin therapy for serious bacterial infectionsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Clinical Evaluation of PiperacillinChemotherapy, 1980
- Susceptibility of the Anaerobic Bacteria, Group D Streptococci, Enterobacteriaceae , and Pseudomonas to Semisynthetic Penicillins: Carbenicillin, Piperacillin, and TicarcillinAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1978
- Susceptibility of cephalothin-resistant gram-negative bacilli to piperacillin, cefuroxime, and other selected antibioticsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1978