The limitations of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: Comparative analysis with conventional arteriography
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Vol. 41 (3) , 462-468
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.12.045
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiographyJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2002
- Is duplex scanning the best screening test for renal artery stenosis?Seminars in Vascular Surgery, 2001
- Characterization of renal artery stenoses based on magnetic resonance renal flow and volume measurementsKidney International, 1999
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography Versus Duplex Sonography for Diagnosing Renovascular DiseaseHypertension, 1999
- Contrast‐enhanced, k‐space‐centered, breath‐hold MR angiography of the renal arteries and the abdominal aortaJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1997
- Value of Doppler parameters in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosisJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1996
- Renal artery stenosis and hypertensionThe Lancet, 1994
- Measuring carotid stenosis. Time for a reappraisal.Stroke, 1993
- Prospective Study on Captopril Renography in Hypertensive PatientsAmerican Journal of Nephrology, 1992
- Prevalence of Renovascular Hypertension in Patients with Grade III or IV Hypertensive RetinopathyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979