Will alternative immediate care services reduce demands for non-urgent treatment at accident and emergency?
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Emergency Medicine Journal
- Vol. 18 (6) , 482-487
- https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.18.6.482
Abstract
Objectives—To estimate the potential of general practice, minor injury units, walk in centres and NHS Direct to reduce non-urgent demands on accident and emergency (A&E) departments taking into account the patient's reasons for attending A&E. Methods—A questionnaire survey and notes review of 267 adults presenting to the A&E department of a large teaching hospital in Sheffield, England, triaged to the two lowest priority treatment streams, was conducted over seven weeks. Using defined criteria, patients were classified by the suitability of the presenting health problem to be managed by alternative immediate care services or only by A&E, and also by the likelihood, in similar circumstances, of patients presenting to other services given their reasons for seeking A&E care. Results—Full data were obtained for 96% of participants (255 of 267). Using objective criteria, it is estimated that 55% (95% CI 50%, 62%) of the health problems presented by a non-urgent population attending A&E are suitable for treatment in either general practice, or a minor injury unit, or a walk in centre or by self care after advice from NHS Direct. However, in almost one quarter (24%) of low priority patients who self referred, A&E was not the first contact with the health services for the presenting health problem. The reason for attending A&E cited most frequently by the patients was a belief that radiography was necessary. The reason given least often was seeking advice from a nurse practitioner. Taking into account the objective suitability of the health problem to be treated elsewhere, and the reasons for attending A&E given by the patients, it is estimated that, with similar health problems, as few as 7% (95% CI 3%, 10%) of the non-urgent A&E population may be expected to present to providers other than A&E in the future. Conclusions—The increasing availability of alternative services offering first contact care for non-urgent health problems, is likely to have little impact on the demand for A&E services.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of NHS Direct on demand for immediate care: observational studyBMJ, 2000
- Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse practitioners or junior doctors: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 1998
- Providing primary care in the accident and emergency departmentBMJ, 1998
- Ambulatory visits to hospital emergency departments. Patterns and reasons for use. 24 Hours in the ED Study GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- Cost effectiveness of treating primary care patients in accident and emergency: a comparison between general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrarsBMJ, 1996
- Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in an urban accident and emergency department: process, outcome, and comparative costBMJ, 1996
- Primary care in London: an evaluation of general practitioners working in an inner city accident and emergency department.Emergency Medicine Journal, 1996
- Primary care in the accident and emergency department: II. comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctorsBMJ, 1995
- Primary care in accident and emergency and general practice: A comparisonSocial Science & Medicine, 1992