Interval versus continuous exercise training after coronary bypass surgery: A comparison of training‐induced acute reactions with respect to the effectiveness of the exercise methods
Open Access
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Cardiology
- Vol. 13 (12) , 851-861
- https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960131208
Abstract
In order to improve endurance by exercise on a bicycle ergometer, both the interval method (I) (exertion and recovery phases alternate each minute) and the continuous method (constant exertion) can be employed. We examined the effects of both methods on the following parameters: heart rate, blood pressure, rate‐pressure product, glucose, lactate, and catecholamine levels, and physical performance. Two groups of nine male patients were trained daily on a bicycle ergometer for 3.5 weeks. These patients had undergone coronary bypass surgery 24 and/or 26 days before the training started. The training heart rate was set at 86% of the individual maximum heart rate. In the last week of training, the exercise intensity in both patient groups, following either I or C regimen, was 20:121 W and 83 W respectively. The exercise training lasted 20 minutes with the following findings: (1) there were no significant differences in blood pressure, rate‐pressure product, rates of glucose and catecholamines, and (2) there was a significantly higher rate of lactate in the second ten minutes of the I training. Before and after the training period, the patients were subjected to a multistage bicycle ergometer exercise test (sitting). The following results obtained after the training favor the I method: (1) patients' physical performance increased ( + 0.63 vs. + 0.26 W/kg; p < 0.001); (2) heart rate was lower at rest ( ‐ 9 vs. ‐ 4 beats/min; p < 0.04) and at 75 W ( ‐ 12 vs. ‐ 2 beats/min; p < 0.02); (3) rate‐pressure product was lower at rest ( ‐ 1675 vs. ‐ 291; p < 0.04) and at 75 W ( ‐ 2810 vs. ‐ 735; p < 0.05); (4) rate of lactate was lower at 75 W ( ‐ 0.83 vs. ‐ 0.33 mmol/1; p < 0.04); (5) catecholamines were not lowered by I or C training, and no differences between the two groups could be observed. Exercise training according to the I method involves both the aerobic and anaerobic capacity of the organism, whereas exercise training according to the C method involves only oxidative capacity. After coronary bypass surgery, the I method is better suited to increase physical performance and is more effective in economizing the cardiac function.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Die physiologische Variabilität der Plasma-KatecholamineJournal of Molecular Medicine, 1986
- Plasma catecholamines,?-adrenergic receptors, and isoproterenol sensitivity in endurance trained and non-endurance trained volunteersEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1984
- HOW CAN WE MEASURE SYMPATHETIC NERVOUS SYSTEM “TONE” IN PATIENTS?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Grundlagen für Die Bewegungstherapie Nach HerzoperationPublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- Plasma Catecholamines in Trained and Untrained Volunteers During Graduated Exercise*International Journal of Sports Medicine, 1981
- Simultaneous radioenzymatic determination of plasma and tissue adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine within the femtomole rangeLife Sciences, 1976
- Biochemical Adaptations to Endurance Exercise in MuscleAnnual Review of Physiology, 1976
- The Nature of the Training Response; Peripheral and Central Adaptations to One‐Legged ExerciseActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1976
- Physical Training, Bradycardia, and Autonomic Nervous SystemScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1973