Analgesic Efficacy After Single and Repeated Doses of Codeine and Acetaminophen
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 24 (1) , 27-34
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1984.tb01810.x
Abstract
A double‐blind randomized analgesic trial was carried out in patients suffering from pain after removal of a third molar tooth. In a two‐dose regimen, 108 patients received either 60 mg codeine, 500 mg acetaminophen, or 1000 mg acetaminophen. On the day of surgery, the patients assessed their pain intensity hourly on a visual analog scale. The evaluation was carried out during the 10‐hour period after first medication. The best pain reducing effects were achieved with 1000 mg acetaminophen. Both the category and position of each tooth were examined in relation to pain intensity; however, the statistical analysis did not reveal any significant correlation. In all treatment groups, the efficacy of the second dose was superior to that of the first, and the most pronounced difference was obtained in patients taking codeine, who increased their pain reduction from 20 to 60 per cent. Clinical comparisons including codeine may therefore be better carried out in a repeated‐dose regimen.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Visual analogue scale and the analysis of analgesic actionEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1983
- An analgesic study with repeated doses of Phenazone, phenazone plus dextropro-poxyphene, and paracetamol, using a visual analogue scaleInternational Journal of Oral Surgery, 1982
- Paracetamol plus supplementary doses of codeine an analgesic study of repeated dosesEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1982
- The Visual Analog Scale in Multiple‐Dose Evaluations of AnalgesicsThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1981
- The Use of the Rank Transform in RegressionTechnometrics, 1979
- Codeine and Propoxyphene in Postepisiotomy PainPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1977
- Paracetamol/codeine in relieving pain following removal of impacted mandibular third molarsInternational Journal of Oral Surgery, 1975