Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?
- 18 February 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Controlled Clinical Trials
- Vol. 25 (1) , 31-52
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability of Postal Questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome ScaleJournal of Neurotrauma, 2002
- How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?Statistics in Medicine, 2002
- Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic reviewBMJ, 2002
- Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studiesBMJ, 2000
- Corticosteroids in head injury--the CRASH trial.Emergency Medicine Journal, 1999
- Structured Interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for Their UseJournal of Neurotrauma, 1998
- Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testBMJ, 1997
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials?Statistics in Medicine, 1984