HOW “REPRESENTATIVE” ARE SUBJECTS ATTENDING A CORONARY RISK FACTOR SCREENING PROGRAMME?
- 1 February 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 14 (1) , 35-38
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.1984.tb03582.x
Abstract
Coronary risk factors were compared in 2 groups of [human] subjects aged 25-64 yr. One group voluntarily, and at no cost, attended a risk factor screening clinic (n = 3844), while the 2nd group represented a population sample drawn from the metropolitan Sydney electoral roll (n = 1394). Older subjects were over-represented in the screening clinic compared with the electoral roll sample. Hypercholesterolemia was more prevalent in the screening clinic in older females, while hypertension and current cigarette smoking were less prevalent in the screening clinic in older subjects of both sexes. Obesity was less prevalent in the screening clinic in older males. A voluntary screening program may generate a unique and possibly unreproducible population sample.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changing U.S. Life Style and Declining Vascular Mortality — A RetrospectiveNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- A comparison of populations self-selected and randomly selected for coronary risk factor screeningPreventive Medicine, 1983
- EFFECT OF DIET AND SMOKING INTERVENTION ON THE INCIDENCE OF CORONARY HEART DISEASEThe Lancet, 1981
- Coronary screening and follow‐upThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1981
- Characteristics of men most likely to respond to an invitation to be screened.American Journal of Public Health, 1979
- DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RESPONDENTS AND NON-RESPONDENTS IN A POPULATION-BASED CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE STUDY1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1978