Experimental evidence for a non-conducted response of nerve to subthreshold stimulation

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
It is assumed in most theories of excitation (e. g. Hill 1936a) that, when a critical state is reached at a point of the nerve, “excitation” occurs and then automatically propagates over the whole length of the nerve fibre. Since, however, the self-conduction of an impulse involves stimulation of each element by the simultaneous activity of a finite adjacent region of nerve, it is more natural to suppose that initially also a certainminimal lengthof nerve must be excited by an applied shock, in order to give rise to a propagated disturbance. A subthreshold stimulus, therefore, by exciting too small a region, might produce a localized response, the spread and size of which are not enough to excite resting points further on. If such a non-conducted response can actually occur, it might be expected (i) to facilitate excitation by a second shock, if applied to the same region shortly after the first, and (ii) to be accompanied by a small local action potential. Both possibilities can be investigated experimentally, though both might be expected to be complicated by the direct effects (electrotonus,“local potential”) of the first shock.

This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit: