The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 11 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Critical Care
- Vol. 9 (6) , R764-70
- https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3909
Abstract
Introduction: Compliance with the ventilator care bundle affects the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia. It was not known, however, whether compliance with sepsis care bundles has an impact on outcome. The aims of the present study were to determine the rate of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles and to determine the impact of the compliance on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study on 101 consecutive adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock on medical or surgical wards, or in accident and emergency areas at two acute National Health Service Trust Teaching hospitals in England. The main outcome measures were: the rate of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis care bundles adapted from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines on patients' clinical care; and the difference in hospital mortality between the compliant and the non-compliant groups. Results: The median age of the patients was 69 years (interquartile range 51 to 78), and 53% were male. The sources of infection were sought and confirmed in 87 of 101 patients. The chest was the most common source (50%), followed by the abdomen (22%). The rate of compliance with the 6-hour sepsis bundle was 52%. Compared with the compliant group, the non-compliant group had a more than twofold increase in hospital mortality (49% versus 23%, relative risk (RR) 2.12 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 3.76), P = 0.01) despite similar age and severity of sepsis. Compliance with the 24-hour sepsis bundle was achieved in only 30% of eligible candidates (21/69). Hospital mortality was increased in the non-compliant group from 29% to 50%, with a 76% increase in risk for death, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (RR 1.76 (95% CI 0.84 to 3.64), P = 0.16). Conclusion: Non-compliance with the 6-hour sepsis bundle was associated with a more than twofold increase in hospital mortality. Non-compliance with the 24-hour sepsis bundle resulted in a 76% increase in risk for hospital death. All medical staff should practise these relatively simple, easy and cheap bundles within a strict timeframe to improve survival rates in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of a patient information system to audit the introduction of modified early warning scoringJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2005
- Sepsis change bundles: Converting guidelines into meaningful change in behavior and clinical outcomeCritical Care Medicine, 2004
- Using checklists and reminders in clinical pathways to improve hospital inpatient careThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2004
- Improved adherence to practice guidelines yields better outcome in high‐risk patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation: findings from nationwide FINACS studiesJournal of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shockCritical Care Medicine, 2004
- Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of careCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Confidential inquiry into quality of care before admission to intensive careBMJ, 1998
- Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarctionBMJ, 1995