Scientific and cost-effectiveness criteria in selecting batteries of short-term tests
- 31 December 1988
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology
- Vol. 205 (1-4) , 41-49
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(88)90007-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-effectiveness of short-term tests for carcinogenicityNature, 1986
- Short‐term test results for NTP noncarcinogens: An alternate, more predictive batteryEnvironmental Mutagenesis, 1986
- Cluster analysis in predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals using short-term assaysMutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology, 1985
- The carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method: A bayesian approachMutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology, 1985
- Assembly and preliminary analysis of a genotoxicity data base for predicting carcinogensMutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology, 1985
- Rational approach to the evaluation of short‐term tests: Analysis of a homogeneous data baseJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1985
- Statistical issues in the design, analysis and interpretation of animal carcinogenicity studies.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1984
- An evaluation of salmonella (Ames) test data in the published literature: Application of statistical procedures and analysis of mutagenic potencyMutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology, 1984
- A reexamination of false-positive rates for carcinogenesis studiesFundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1983
- A Model for Selecting Short-Term Tests of CarcinogenicityJournal of the American College of Toxicology, 1983