Comparison of Recovery of Blood Culture Isolates from Two BacT/ALERT FAN Aerobic Blood Culture Bottles with Recovery from One FAN Aerobic Bottle and One FAN Anaerobic Bottle
Open Access
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 41 (1) , 213-217
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.1.213-217.2003
Abstract
Traditionally, a routine blood culture for adult patients consisted of paired aerobic and anaerobic bottles, but the routine use of an anaerobic blood culture bottle has been challenged in recent years. In this study, we compared the recovery of two FAN aerobic bottles with one FAN aerobic and one FAN anaerobic bottle. Each pair of bottles was collected by a separate collection procedure, and each bottle held a recommended 8- to 12-ml draw. A total of 704 clinically significant isolates were recovered from 8,620 sets (17,240 pairs), with 487 (69.2%) isolates recovered from one or both bottles in each pair of bottles, 86 isolates (12.2%) recovered only from the FAN aerobic-FAN aerobic pair, and 131 isolates (18.6%) recovered only from the FAN aerobic-FAN anaerobic pair. Significantly more total organisms (P = 0.002), gram-positive cocci (P = 0.03), Staphylococcus aureus (P = 0.05), Enterobacteriaceae other than Escherichia coli (P = 0.02), and anaerobes (P = 0.01) were recovered from the FAN aerobic-FAN anaerobic pair than from the FAN aerobic-FAN aerobic pair. A separate analysis was performed on the 618 isolates that were recovered from the FAN aerobic-FAN anaerobic pair to compare recovery by bottle type. Significantly more S. aureus (P = 0.005) and anaerobes (P < 0.001) were recovered from the FAN anaerobic bottle, while significantly more coagulase-negative staphylococci (P = 0.01), Streptococcus pneumoniae (P = 0.03), and other gram-negative bacilli (P = 0.004) were recovered from the FAN aerobic bottle. These results support the routine use of a FAN anaerobic bottle for use in the culture of blood with the BacT/ALERT system in our institution. These results also suggest that the decision of whether to routinely utilize an anaerobic blood culture bottle should be influenced by the overall recovery of bacteria and yeast, the recovery of specific types of bacteria or yeast, the medium type, and the blood culture system utilized by the laboratory.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical value of anaerobic blood culture: a retrospective analysis of positive patient episodesJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2000
- Reassessment of the routine anaerobic culture and incubation time in the BacT/Alert FAN blood culture bottlesDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1999
- Reassessment of the incubation time in a controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert aerobic FAN bottle and standard anaerobic bottle used aerobically for the detection of bloodstream infectionsDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1998
- Clinical Significance and Outcome of Anaerobic BacteremiaClinical Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Evaluation of Routine Anaerobic Blood Cultures in the BacT/Alert Blood Culture SystemAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1995
- Selection of a clinically satisfactory blood culture system: The utility of anaerobic mediaClinical Microbiology Newsletter, 1995
- Clinical assessment of anaerobic isolates from blood culturesDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1993
- Routine anaerobic blood cultures: Reasons for continued useClinical Microbiology Newsletter, 1992
- Critical assessment of blood culture techniques: analysis of recovery of obligate and facultative anaerobes, strict aerobic bacteria, and fungi in aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottlesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1992
- Routine anaerobic blood cultures: Still appropriate today?Clinical Microbiology Newsletter, 1991