Are Morally Motivated Decision Makers Insensitive to the Consequences of Their Choices?
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 18 (1) , 24-28
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01843.x
Abstract
Is morally motivated decision making different from other kinds of decision making? There is evidence that when people have sacred or protected values (PVs), they reject trade-offs for secular values (e.g., “You can't put a price on a human life”) and tend to employ deontological rather than consequentialist decision principles. People motivated by PVs appear to show quantity in-sensitivity. That is, in trade-off situations, they are less sensitive to the consequences of their choices than are people without PVs. The current study examined the relation between PVs and quantity insensitivity using two methods of preference assessment: In one design, previous results were replicated; in a second, PVs were related to increased quantity sensitivity. These and other findings call into question important presumed properties of PVs, suggesting that how PVs affect willingness to make tradeoffs depends on where attention is focused, a factor that varies substantially across contexts.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Omission bias, individual differences, and normalityOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2004
- Omission bias in vaccination decisions: Where’s the “omission”? Where’s the “bias”?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2003
- Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors.Psychological Review, 2002
- A Rose by Any Name? The Values ConstructPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2000
- Protected Values and Omission BiasOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999
- Taboo Trade‐offs: Reactions to Transactions That Transgress the Spheres of JusticePolitical Psychology, 1997
- Protected ValuesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- Omission and commission in judgment and choiceJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1991
- Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguityJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1990
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskEconometrica, 1979