Prehospital versus hospital fibrinolytic therapy using automated versus cardiologist electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction: abortion of myocardial infarction and unjustified fibrinolytic therapy
Open Access
- 31 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 147 (3) , 509-515
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- TIMI Risk Score for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Convenient, Bedside, Clinical Score for Risk Assessment at PresentationCirculation, 2000
- Effect of prehospital thrombolysis on aborting acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hourThe Lancet, 1996
- Inadvertent thrombolytic therapy for cardiovascular diseases masquerading as acute coronary thrombosisClinical Cardiology, 1993
- Accuracy of a portable interpretive ECG machine in diagnosis of acute evolving myocardial infarctionAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Accuracy of computer-interpreted electrocardiography in selecting patients for thrombolytic therapyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- The dilemma of sensitivity versus specificity in computer-interpreted acute myocardial infarctionJournal of Electrocardiology, 1991
- Cardiovascular complications of thrombolytic therapy in patients with a mistaken diagnosis of acute myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Inadvertent administration of streptokinase to patients with pericarditisThe American Journal of Medicine, 1986
- The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs.Circulation, 1977