Strategic Process Research: Questions and Recommendations

1 October 1983

journal article
Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review

Vol. 8 (4) , 565-575
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1983.4284655

Abstract

The characteristics of the two most frequently cited types of strategy formulation models are compared to illustrate their major differences. A number of research issues emerge. Additional research issues then are identified in a review of literature that has raised questions about the most common model. Recommendations are provided in an attempt to help investigators pursue these and other strategic process questions.

Keywords

This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:

Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action
Published by Elsevier ,2004
Performance and consensus
Strategic Management Journal, 1980
Organizational Behavior
Annual Review of Psychology, 1979
Managerial Problem Solving Models: A Review and a Proposal
Academy of Management Review, 1978
A Contextual Model of Strategic Decision Making in Organizations.
Academy of Management Proceedings, 1977
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Science, 1974
The foreign investment decision process
The International Executive, 1966
On the Concept of Organizational Goal
Administrative Science Quarterly, 1964
The Analysis of Goals in Complex Organizations
American Sociological Review, 1961
The Science of "Muddling Through"
Public Administration Review, 1959