Unstented and Partial Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement-Up to 6 Years of Follow-Up
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Journal of Cardiac Surgery
- Vol. 6 (4S) , 600-605
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.1991.6.4s.600
Abstract
Since January 8,1985, three different designs of unstented (type A, n = 9) and partial stented (type B, n = 4; and type C, n = 3) glutaraldehyde preserved porcine aortic valves were used for aortic valve replacement in 16 patients with acquired aortic valve lesions. Type A and type B prostheses were Implanted using a two suture row technique. In type C prostheses, only a single suture row was necessary for implantation, facilitating surgery considerably. In all patients, the fully flexible commissures of the bioprostheses were secured to the aortic wall of the recipient. There was no hospital mortality. Two patients with type A bioprostheses died due to noncardiac causes, 4 and 24 months postoperatively. One bioprosthesis in this group had to be replaced after 3 months because of insufficiency. Serial Doppler echocardiographic studies were performed up to 6 years after implantation. No significant leaflet calcification was observed. In three type A bioprostheses, a mild insufficiency without progression was recorded. The latest mean/peak transprosthetic pressure gradients were: type A: 6 ± 4 mmHg/12 ± 6 mmHg; type B: 6 ± 3 mmHg/14 ± 5 mmHg; and type C: 11 ± 5 mmHg/18 ± 8 mmHg. The functional results of the type A and type B bioprostheses have proven to be satisfactory. The slightly higher pressure gradients in patients with a type C bioprosthesis give rise to further refinements of its design. These results confirm the usefulness of imitating normal anatomy by using unstented or partial stented bioprostheses.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance of the Hancock Porcine Bioprosthesis Following Aortic Valve Replacement: Considerations Based on a 15-Year ExperienceThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Long-term performance of porcine heart valve bioprosthesesEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mappingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- In Vitro Evaluation of Six Mechanical and Six Bioprosthetic ValvesThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 1986
- Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography.Circulation, 1985
- Implantation of a Xenogeneic Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis. First ExperienceThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 1985
- Structure and classification of cuspal tears and perforations in porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves implanted in patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1981
- Stresses of Natural versus Prosthetic Aortic Valve Leaflets in VivoThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1980
- HETEROGRAFT AORTIC VALVE TRANS‐PLANTATION FOR HUMAN VALVE DISEASEThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1966
- HETEROLOGOUS AORTIC VALVE TRANSPLANTATIONThe Lancet, 1965