Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- theory and-methods
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 60 (9) , 804-810
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.041319
Abstract
Study objective: Education, income, and occupational class are often used interchangeably in studies showing social inequalities in health. This procedure implies that all three characteristics measure the same underlying phenomena. This paper questions this practice. The study looked for any independent effects of education, income, and occupational class on four health outcomes: diabetes prevalence, myocardial infarction incidence and mortality, and finally all cause mortality in populations from Sweden and Germany. Design: Sweden: follow up of myocardial infarction mortality and all cause mortality in the entire population, based on census linkage to the Cause of Death Registry. Germany: follow up of myocardial infarction morbidity and all cause mortality in statutory health insurance data, plus analysis of prevalence data on diabetes. Multiple regression analyses were performed to calculate the effects of education, income, and occupational class before and after mutual adjustments. Setting and participants: Sweden (all residents aged 25–64) and Germany (Mettman district, Nordrhein-Westfalen, all insured persons aged 25–64). Main results: Correlations between education, income, and occupational class were low to moderate. Which of these yielded the strongest effects on health depended on type of health outcome in question. For diabetes, education was the strongest predictor and for all cause mortality it was income. Myocardial infarction morbidity and mortality showed a more mixed picture. In mutually adjusted analyses each social dimension had an independent effect on each health outcome in both countries. Conclusions: Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably as indicators of a hypothetical latent social dimension. Although correlated, they measure different phenomena and tap into different causal mechanisms.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Income as mediator of the effect of occupation on the risk of myocardial infarction: does the income measurement matter?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2005
- Socioeconomic status and smokingEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2005
- “Fundamental Causes” of Social Inequalities in Mortality: A Test of the TheoryJournal of Health and Social Behavior, 2004
- Fetal growth predicts stress susceptibility independent of parental education in 161 991 adolescent Swedish male conscriptsJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2004
- Pathways between socioeconomic determinants of healthJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2004
- Psychosocial work environment and myocardial infarction: improving risk estimation by combining two complementary job stress models in the SHEEP StudyJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2002
- Income, occupational position, qualification and health inequalities---competing risks? (Comparing indicators of social status)Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2000
- Education and occupational social class: which is the more important indicator of mortality risk?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1998
- The concept of status incongruence revisitedScandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 1997
- Low status control, high effort at work and ischemic heart disease: Prospective evidence from blue-collar menSocial Science & Medicine, 1990