Variations in Morbidity after Radical Prostatectomy
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 11 April 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 346 (15) , 1138-1144
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa011788
Abstract
Recent studies of surgery for cancer have demonstrated variations in outcomes among hospitals and among surgeons. We sought to examine variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare linked data base to evaluate health-related outcomes after radical prostatectomy. The rates of postoperative complications, late urinary complications (strictures or fistulas 31 to 365 days after the procedure), and long-term incontinence (more than 1 year after the procedure) were inferred from the Medicare claims records of 11,522 patients who underwent prostatectomy between 1992 and 1996. These rates were analyzed in relation to hospital volume and surgeon volume (the number of procedures performed at individual hospitals and by individual surgeons, respectively). Neither hospital volume nor surgeon volume was significantly associated with surgery-related death. Significant trends in the relation between volume and outcome were observed with respect to postoperative complications and late urinary complications. Postoperative morbidity was lower in very-high-volume hospitals than in low-volume hospitals (27 percent vs. 32 percent, P=0.03) and was also lower when the prostatectomy was performed by very-high-volume surgeons than when it was performed by low-volume surgeons (26 percent vs. 32 percent, P<0.001). The rates of late urinary complications followed a similar pattern. Results for long-term preservation of continence were less clear-cut. In a detailed analysis of the 159 surgeons who had a high or very high volume of procedures, wide surgeon-to-surgeon variations in these clinical outcomes were observed, and they were much greater than would be predicted on the basis of chance or observed variations in the case mix. In men undergoing prostatectomy, the rates of postoperative and late urinary complications are significantly reduced if the procedure is performed in a high-volume hospital and by a surgeon who performs a high number of such procedures.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Influence of Hospital Volume on Survival after Resection for Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- POTENCY, CONTINENCE AND COMPLICATION RATES IN 1,870 CONSECUTIVE RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMIESJournal of Urology, 1999
- Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomySurgery, 1999
- HAVE COMPLICATION RATES DECREASED AFTER TREATMENT FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER?Journal of Urology, 1999
- Early Complication of Anatomical Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Lessons from a Single-Center ExperienceUrologia Internationalis, 1997
- The importance of volume in colorectal cancer surgeryEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1996
- Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival. Delivery systems and medical outcomesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Best Subsets Logistic RegressionBiometrics, 1989
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987