Who Gets the Credit?
- 1 February 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Small Group Research
- Vol. 26 (1) , 56-76
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496495261003
Abstract
Although Hollander characterized idiosyncrasy credit as the product of perceptions group members have of one another, no one has ever captured these perceptions. We suggest that perceptions of idiosyncrasy credit are directly accessible as an empirical and measurable concept. To demonstrate this, we followed seven naturally occurring, on-going work groups and asked group members to report the level of idiosyncrasy credit-measured as latitude to deviate and seriousness of consideration-they allocated to each other. Our results indicated that perceptions of idiosyncrasy credit were internally reliable across items, across time, and across group members. Further, perceptions of idiosyncrasy credit were predictably related to leadership and socially dominant behaviors. Group performance moderated these relationships. Implications of this studyfor research on idiosyncrasy credit, leadership, and group performance were discussed.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Leadership, followership, self, and othersThe Leadership Quarterly, 1992
- Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition.American Psychologist, 1990
- A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989
- Minority influence and idiosyncrasy credit: A new comparison of the Moscovici and Hollander theories of innovationEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1987
- Leader Legitimacy, Leader-Follower Interaction, and Followers' Ratings of the LeaderThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1983
- Social influence by group members with minority opinions: A comparison of Hollander and Moscovici.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- Leadership and Social Exchange ProcessesPublished by Springer Nature ,1980
- Informal Reactions to Deviance in Simulated Work Organizations: A Laboratory ExperimentAmerican Sociological Review, 1968
- Some effects of perceived status on responses to innovative behavior.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961
- Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit.Psychological Review, 1958