Abstract
On the basis of new observations using the etch hillick technique, one conclusion concerning dislocation reactions reported in a previous short note is partly corrected. The reactions represent a coalescence of two dislocations and the splitting of a single dislocation into two dislocation. They are expressed by (1/2)[111](1̄10)+(1/2)[11̄1̄](110)\rightleftharpoons[100](010).

This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit: