Comparison of Ascending and Bracketing Methods in Pure Tone AudiometryA Multi-laboratory Study
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Audiology
- Vol. 8 (4) , 247-251
- https://doi.org/10.3109/01050397909076327
Abstract
Four laboratories participated in this study to compare ascending and bracketing methods in manual determination of hearing thresholds using attenuators with 5 dB step. In all, 214 ears were measured. No significant difference was found between mean thresholds obtained with the two methods in the frequency range 0.5–6 kHz; the four-laboratory, six-frequency grand mean difference was -0.31 dB. The variability among subjects also remained essentially the same for the two methods. However, the bracketing method required a significantly longer test time than the ascending method.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Normal Hearing Threshold Determined by Manual and Self-Recording TechniquesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1966
- Preferred Method For Clinical Determination Of Pure-Tone ThresholdsJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1959
- Comparison of the Auditory Threshold as Measured by Individual Pure Tone and by Békésy AudiometryThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1957