Is it time to reassess the risk for the growth-retarded fetus with normal Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical artery?
- 1 June 1994
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 170 (6) , 1734-1743
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70349-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic Value of Blood Sampling in Fetuses with Growth RetardationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Comparison of umbilical-artery velocimetry and cardiotocography for surveillance of small-for-gestational-age fetusesThe Lancet, 1992
- Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis in high risk pregnancies: a randomized controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Is intrauterine growth retardation with normal umbilical artery blood flow a benign condition?BMJ, 1990
- Umbilical artery velocity waveforms: poor association with small‐for‐gestational‐age babiesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION: PREDICTION OF PERINATAL DISTRESS BY DOPPLER ULTRASOUNDThe Lancet, 1987
- Doppler studies in the growth retarded fetus and prediction of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis, haemorrhage, and neonatal morbidity.BMJ, 1987
- UMBILICAL ARTERY FLOW VELOCITY WAVEFORMS IN HIGH-RISK PREGNANCYThe Lancet, 1987
- Umbilical and uterine artery flow velocity waveforms in pregnancy associated with major fetal abnormalityBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- Umbilical artery blood flow characteristics in normal and growth‐retarded fetuses.BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985