Meat versus within-bone nutrients: Another look at the meaning of body part representation in archaeological sites
- 31 March 1991
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Archaeological Science
- Vol. 18 (2) , 149-163
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4403(91)90044-p
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why does skeletal part representation differ between smaller and larger bovids at klasies river mouth and other archeological sites?Journal of Archaeological Science, 1989
- Variability in bone assemblage formation from Hadza hunting, scavenging, and carcass processingJournal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1988
- Bare bones archaeology: Bone marrow indices and efficiencyJournal of Archaeological Science, 1988
- Implications of bone modification in a neolithic faunal assemblage for the study of early hominid butchery and subsistence practicesJournal of Human Evolution, 1986
- Systematic Butchery by Plio/Pleistocene Hominids at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 1986
- Carcass consumption sequences and the archaeological distinction of scavenging and huntingJournal of Human Evolution, 1986
- Bone frequencies: differential transport, in situ destruction, and the MGUIJournal of Archaeological Science, 1985
- Bone density and differential survivorship of fossil classesJournal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1984
- Preliminary report on archaeological research in the Loita-Mara region, S.W. KenyaAzania: Archaeological Research in Africa, 1982
- The Mammalian Fauna of the Klasies River Mouth Sites, Southern Cape Province, South AfricaThe South African Archaeological Bulletin, 1976