A Prospective Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication With Anterior vs Posterior Hiatal Repair
Open Access
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 136 (7) , 745-751
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.136.7.745
Abstract
SINCE THE EARLY 1990s, the status of laparoscopic antireflux surgery has moved from experimental to routine, with large experiences now reported by many centers.1-3 Furthermore, the outcome in the majority of patients undergoing such surgery is good, with relief of reflux symptoms and few adverse effects in about 90% of patients.1,4-6 However, some patients develop problems following fundoplication.6 Problems due to hiatal herniation after surgery are now less common because hiatal repair has become routine during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in most centers,7,8 but some patients still experience troublesome dysphagia following fundoplication. Recently reported randomized trials have suggested that the problem of dysphagia might be reduced following anterior partial fundoplication,6 while routine division of the short gastric vessels has not been demonstrated to be of benefit.9,10Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early reoperation following laparoscopic antireflux surgeryThe American Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Randomized trial to study the effect of fundic mobilization on long-term results of Nissen fundoplicationBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Intermediate follow-up of laparoscopic antireflux surgeryThe American Journal of Surgery, 1996
- Stenosis of the Esophageal Hiatus Following Laparoscopic FundoplicationArchives of Surgery, 1995
- Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Is an Effective Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseAnnals of Surgery, 1994
- A New Dysphagia Score With Objective ValidationJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1992
- Fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in hiatal herniaWorld Journal of Surgery, 1977