Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence.
Open Access
- 1 February 1981
- Vol. 22 (2) , 126-129
- https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.22.2.126
Abstract
Sixty-three patients with complete rectal prolapse and/or faecal incontinence have undergone anal manometry and the results have been compared with an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls. Maximal basal pressure (MBP) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) were measured before and at four months and a year after treatment. The anal pressures of normal subjects are presented. Patients with rectal prolapse alone had normal anal pressures, whereas patients with incontinence with or without prolapse had significantly lower basal and squeeze pressures than controls. Successful surgical treatment of prolapse or incontinence did not produce significant change in anal canal pressures, whereas the combination of pelvic floor exercises and a continence aid was associated with a significant rise in MSP.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse.Gut, 1977
- Measurement of anal pressure and motility.Gut, 1976
- Royal Society of Medicine, Section of Proctology; Meeting 27 November 1974. President's Address. Anorectal incontinence.1975
- Procidentia of the rectumDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1975
- Ivalon (polyvinyl alcohol) sponge in the repair of complete rectal prolapseBritish Journal of Surgery, 1972
- The effects of ageing and of cachexia upon skeletal muscle A histopathological studyJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 1969
- Some observations on the movement of the pelvic floor and rectum with special reference to rectal prolapseBritish Journal of Surgery, 1966
- ELECTRICAL TREATMENT OF ANAL INCONTINENCEThe Lancet, 1966
- The functional importance of the internal anal sphincterBritish Journal of Surgery, 1964
- A physiological study of the pelvic floor in rectal prolapse.1962