Control and restraint in contemporary psychiatric nursing: some ethical considerations
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 22 (1) , 110-115
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010110.x
Abstract
This paper begins with an exploration of current attitudes towards the use of physical restraint in psychiatric nursing, and the contributions which the 1985 Ritchie Report and the 1991 Report of the Committee Of Inquiry Into Ashworth Hospital have made to the debate on the use of control and restraint within psychiatric institutions. The main focus of the paper, though, is an evaluation of the ethical justifications for and the ethical and political objections to the use of physical restraint techniques as a response to aggressive and self-injurious behaviour in contemporary mental health nursing practice. The author concludes that the number of situations where control and restraint techniques are used might be reduced by the development of new therapeutic approaches. Such approaches should allow for more negotiation regarding care between clients and nurses, and acknowledge the potential benefits of clients resisting supposedly therapeutic interventions which they find unhelpful.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Offenders, Deviants or Patients?Published by Taylor & Francis ,2008
- Nursing management of self-mutilationBritish Journal of Nursing, 1994
- The contradictions of mental health nursingNursing Standard, 1993
- Experiencing PsychiatryPublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,1993
- Use and abuse of control and restraintNursing Standard, 1992
- Mental Health, Race and CulturePublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- Ethical Issues in Mental HealthPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- Frantz Fanon and the Psychology of OppressionPublished by Springer Nature ,1985