Agency and Asset Pricing
Preprint
- 11 March 2008
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
In this paper we present new empirical evidence on the agency based asset pricing model of Brennan (1993). We find strong evidence that in the recent period stocks whose returns covary more with the idiosyncratic component of the S&P500 return have significantly lower returns, holding constant either the market beta or the loadings on the Fama-French factors. The effect is confined mainly to large capitalization stocks, which is consistent with previous evidence that these stocks are favored by institutional investment managers. The lack of evidence for an agency effect in earlier years is also consistent with the much smaller importance of institutional investors in the earlier period and to the late development of risk-adjusted approaches to measuring portfolio management performance.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why constrain your mutual fund manager?Journal of Financial Economics, 2004
- Portfolio Performance and AgencySSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- Greener Pastures and the Impact of Dynamic Institutional PreferencesThe Review of Financial Studies, 2003
- Style investingJournal of Financial Economics, 2003
- On Mutual Fund Investment StylesThe Review of Financial Studies, 2002
- Do Financial Institutions Matter?The Journal of Finance, 2001
- Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to IncentivesJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- Does It All Add Up? Benchmarks and the Compensation of Active Portfolio ManagersThe Journal of Business, 1997
- Are the Reports of Beta's Death Premature?The Journal of Portfolio Management, 1993
- The relationship between return and market value of common stocksJournal of Financial Economics, 1981