Randomized blind trial of a commercial FeLV vaccine
- 15 February 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
- Vol. 196 (4) , 611-616
- https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1990.196.04.611
Abstract
A randomized blind trial of a commercial FeLV vaccine was conducted to evaluate its performance in cats under conditions of long-term natural exposure. Seventy-nine nonviremic, seronegative cats were randomized into 2 groups. Cats were given 3 doses of either FeLV vaccine or placebo (killed rabies virus vaccine) sc at weeks 0, 3, and 9 of the trial. Six weeks later, 44 known-viremic cats were added to the colony. Cats were housed in a single large room and food dishes and litter pans were used in common. Blood samples were collected at 4, 8, and 12 months after the addition of the viremic cats and were assayed for viremia by use of elisa. Twelve-month samples were also assayed independently by use of indirect fluorescent antibody testing. Investigators conducted assays on coded samples without knowledge of the cat's vaccination status; neither the investigators nor colony personnel knew which cats had been given the FeLV vaccine and which had been given the placebo until the twelfth month of exposure. After 12 months of cohabitation with infected cats, vaccinated cats had a significantly (P ≤ 0.02) lower incidence of persistent viremia (defined as 2 positive elisa test results at least 8 weeks apart or 1 positive indirect fluorescent antibody test result), compared with the placebo-inoculated cats. The incidence of persistent viremia was approximately 3 times greater among the placebo-inoculated cats than among vaccinates. A randomized blind trial of a commercial FeLV vaccine was conducted to evaluate its performance in cats under conditions of long-term natural exposure. Seventy-nine nonviremic, seronegative cats were randomized into 2 groups. Cats were given 3 doses of either FeLV vaccine or placebo (killed rabies virus vaccine) sc at weeks 0, 3, and 9 of the trial. Six weeks later, 44 known-viremic cats were added to the colony. Cats were housed in a single large room and food dishes and litter pans were used in common. Blood samples were collected at 4, 8, and 12 months after the addition of the viremic cats and were assayed for viremia by use of elisa. Twelve-month samples were also assayed independently by use of indirect fluorescent antibody testing. Investigators conducted assays on coded samples without knowledge of the cat's vaccination status; neither the investigators nor colony personnel knew which cats had been given the FeLV vaccine and which had been given the placebo until the twelfth month of exposure. After 12 months of cohabitation with infected cats, vaccinated cats had a significantly (P ≤ 0.02) lower incidence of persistent viremia (defined as 2 positive elisa test results at least 8 weeks apart or 1 positive indirect fluorescent antibody test result), compared with the placebo-inoculated cats. The incidence of persistent viremia was approximately 3 times greater among the placebo-inoculated cats than among vaccinates.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- INCREASED RISK FOR LYMPHOMA AND GLOMERULONEPHRITIS IN A CLOSED POPULATION OF CATS EXPOSED TO FELINE LEUKEMIA VIRUSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1980
- HUMORAL IMMUNE REACTIVITY TO FELINE LEUKEMIA-VIRUS AND ASSOCIATED ANTIGENS IN CATS NATURALLY INFECTED WITH FELINE LEUKEMIA-VIRUS1980
- NATURAL FELINE LEUKEMIA-VIRUS INFECTION AND THE IMMUNE-RESPONSE OF CATS OF DIFFERENT AGES1980
- SAFETY AND EFFICACY STUDIES OF LIVE-FELINE AND KILLED-FELINE LEUKEMIA-VIRUS VACCINES1979
- Feline Leukemia Virus Infection: Age-Related Variation in Response of Cats to Experimental Infection2JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1976