Pharmacological Switch in Aβ-Fiber Stimulation-Induced Spinal Transmission in Mice with Partial Sciatic Nerve Injury
Open Access
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Molecular Pain
- Vol. 4, 25
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-4-25
Abstract
Background: We have previously demonstrated that different spinal transmissions are involved in the nociceptive behavior caused by electrical stimulation of Aβ-, Aδ- or C-fibers using a Neurometer® in naïve mice. In this study, we attempted to pharmacologically characterize the alteration in spinal transmission induced by partial sciatic nerve injury in terms of nociceptive behavior and phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK) in the spinal dorsal horn. Results: Aβ-fiber responses (2000-Hz), which were selectively blocked by the AMPA/kainate antagonist CNQX in naïve mice, were hypersensitized but blocked by the NMDA receptor antagonists MK-801 and AP-5 in injured mice in an electrical stimulation-induced paw withdrawal (EPW) test. Although Aδ-fiber responses (250-Hz) were also hypersensitized by nerve injury, there was no change in the pharmacological characteristics of Aδ-fiber responses through NMDA receptors. On the contrary, C-fiber responses (5-Hz) were hyposensitized by nerve injury. Moreover, Aδ- and C-, but not Aβ-fiber stimulations significantly increased the number of pERK-positive neurons in the superficial spinal dorsal horns of naïve mice, and corresponding antagonists used in the EPW test inhibited this increase. In mice with nerve injury, Aβ- as well as Aδ-fiber stimulations significantly increased the number of pERK-positive neurons in the superficial spinal dorsal horn, whereas C-fiber stimulation decreased this number. The nerve injury-specific pERK increase induced by Aβ-stimulation was inhibited by MK-801 and AP-5, but not by CNQX. However, Aβ- and Aδ-stimulations did not affect the number or size of pERK-positive neurons in the dorsal root ganglion, whereas C-fiber-stimulation selectively decreased the number of pERK-positive neurons. Conclusion: These results suggest that Aβ-fiber perception is newly transmitted to spinal neurons, which originally receive only Aδ- and C-fiber-mediated pain transmission, through NMDA receptor-mediated mechanisms, in animals with nerve injury. This pharmacological switch in Aβ-fiber spinal transmission could be a mechanism underlying neuropathic allodynia.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peripheral Mechanisms of Neuropathic Pain — Involvement of Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor-Mediated DemyelinationMolecular Pain, 2008
- The Role of the GluR2 Subunit in AMPA Receptor Function and Synaptic PlasticityNeuron, 2007
- Inhibition of Paclitaxel-Induced A-Fiber Hypersensitization by GabapentinThe Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2006
- Molecular mechanisms of neuropathic pain–phenotypic switch and initiation mechanismsPharmacology & Therapeutics, 2006
- Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in insulin-dependent diabetics with polyneuropathyThe Lancet, 1998
- Clinical Neurophysiology Laboratory Tests to Assess the Nociceptive System in HumansJournal Of Clinical Neurophysiology, 1997
- Computer-controlled lidocaine infusion for the evaluation of neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injuryPain, 1996
- Quantitative Assessment of Differential Sensory Nerve Block after Lidocaine Spinal AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1995
- Peripheral nerve injury triggers central sprouting of myelinated afferentsNature, 1992
- Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animalsPAIN®, 1983