A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor
- 1 November 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 177 (5) , 1018-1023
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70006-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trialPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled TrialObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Cervical Priming With Oral Misoprostol in Pre-Labor Rupture of Membranes at TermObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Preinduction Cervical Ripening with Intravaginal Prostaglandin E1 Methyl Analogue Misoprostol: A Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 1996
- Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): Randomized comparisonAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- A Comparative Study of Vaginal Misoprostol and Intravenous Oxytocin for Induction of LabourGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 1995
- Misoprostol to induce labourThe Lancet, 1992