Role of Anterior Peri‐Third Ventricular Structures in the Regulation of Supraoptic Neuronal Activity and Neurohypophysical Hormone Secretion in the Rat

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Neurohypophysical hormone release, and the electrical activity of single neurons of the supraoptic nucleus, were monitored in urethane‐anaesthetized rats. Immediately after electrolytic lesions of the region anterior and ventral to the third ventricle (AV3V region), supraoptic neurons showed little spontaneous activity and their responses to ip injection of hypertonic saline were severely impaired; corresponding deficits were found in the secretion of both oxytocin and vasopressin. Similar deficits in oxytocin secretion were also found in rats following electrolytic lesions which destroyed all or part of the subfornical organ; however the effects of the lesions were not additive: rats with lesions of both the AV3V region and the subfornical organ region showed a similar degree of impairment of osmotically stimulated oxytocin secretion to rats with lesions of either site alone. Such deficits might occur either as a result of destruction of osmoresponsive projections to the magnocellular nuclei, or as a result of destruction of an afferent input which is essential for the full expression of the innate osmosensitivity of supraoptic neurons. To test the latter possibility, supraoptic neurons in AV3V‐lesioned rats were activated by continuous application of glutamate, and then tested with ip injection of hypertonic saline. Five of seven cells tested responded significantly to the hyperosmotic stimulus, though the responses were significantly weaker than observed in sham‐lesioned rats. We suggest that the innate osmosensitivity of supraoptic neurons does contribute to their responses to systemic osmotic stimulation, but that expression of this innate osmosensitivity requires inputs from the AV3V region and/or the subfornical organ, some of which may also be osmoresponsive. Electrical stimulus pulses applied to the AV3V region influenced the electrical activity of most supraoptic neurons strongly: the predominant response was a short‐latency, short‐duration inhibition followed by long‐latency, long‐duration excitation. Whereas intracerebroventricular administration of the angiotensin II antagonist saralasin reduced spontaneous or osmotically induced activity of supraoptic neurons, the neuronal responses to AV3V stimulation were impaired only with relatively high doses of saralasin. We conclude that angiotensin ll‐sensitive neurons are an important component of the afferent pathways that sustain the excitability of supraoptic neurons, but that angiotensin is probably not the major transmitter of the projection from the AV3V region to the supraoptic nucleus.