Covariates and confounding in epidemiologic studies using metabolic gene polymorphisms
- 29 May 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 100 (1) , 97-100
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.10448
Abstract
The relationship between exposure and disease when biomarkers are introduced in an epidemiologic study is explored and summarized. In molecular epidemiologic studies, biologic measurements play a major role as markers of exposure, disease or susceptibility to disease and/or exposure. In this scenario, the definition and management of confounding factors may change. Sometimes the presence or activation of the biomarker is partially caused by the relevant environmental exposure, and therefore the 2 variables (exposure and biomarker) should not be always treated as confounders of each other. Models of exposure‐disease association in the presence of biologic markers are presented. The concept of confounders is reviewed in light of the role of biomarkers in the pathway between exposure and disease.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer in French-Canadians: Role of carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes and gene-environment interactionsInternational Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Gender differences in genetic susceptibility for lung cancerLung Cancer, 2000
- Chapter 7: Molecular Epidemiology of Genetic Polymorphisms in Estrogen Metabolizing Enzymes in Human Breast CancerJNCI Monographs, 2000
- Glutathione S-Transferase Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer: A HuGE ReviewAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- N-Acetylation phenotype and genotype and risk of bladder cancer in benzidine-exposed workersCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1993
- High Susceptibility to Lung Cancer Analyzed in Terms of Combined Genotypes of P450IA1 and Mu‐class Glutathione S‐Transferase GenesJapanese Journal of Cancer Research, 1992
- Validation of Intermediate End Points in Cancer ResearchJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1990