Toward aerosol/cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) closure during CRYSTAL‐FACE
Open Access
- 18 October 2003
- journal article
- aerosols and-clouds
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Vol. 108 (D20)
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003582
Abstract
During July 2002, measurements of cloud condensation nuclei were made in the vicinity of southwest Florida as part of the Cirrus Regional Study of Tropical Anvils and Cirrus Layers‐Florida Area Cirrus Experiment (CRYSTAL‐FACE) field campaign. These observations, at supersaturations of 0.2 and 0.85%, are presented here. The performance of each of the two CCN counters was validated through laboratory calibration and an in situ intercomparison. The measurements indicate that the aerosol sampled during the campaign was predominantly marine in character: the median concentrations were 233 cm−3 (at S = 0.2%) and 371 cm−3 (at S = 0.85%). Three flights during the experiment differed from this general trend; the aerosol sampled during the two flights on 18 July was more continental in character, and the observations on 28 July indicate high spatial variability and periods of very high aerosol concentrations. This study also includes a simplified aerosol/CCN closure analysis. Aerosol size distributions were measured simultaneously with the CCN observations, and these data are used to predict a CCN concentration using Köhler theory. For the purpose of this analysis, an idealized composition of pure ammonium sulfate was assumed. The analysis indicates that in this case, there was good general agreement between the predicted and observed CCN concentrations: at S = 0.2%, Npredicted/Nobserved = 1.047 (R2 = 0.911); at S = 0.85%, Npredicted/Nobserved = 1.201 (R2 = 0.835). The impacts of the compositional assumption and of including in‐cloud data in the analysis are addressed. The effect of removing the data from the 28 July flight is also examined; doing so improves the result of the closure analysis at S = 0.85%. When omitting that atypical flight, Npredicted/Nobserved = 1.085 (R2 = 0.770) at S = 0.85%.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cloud activation of single‐component organic aerosol particlesJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2002
- Can chemical effects on cloud droplet number rival the first indirect effect?Geophysical Research Letters, 2002
- Sensitivity of CCN spectra on chemical and physical properties of aerosol: A case study from the Amazon BasinJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2002
- Hygroscopic properties of aerosol particles over the central Arctic Ocean during summerJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2001
- Relationships between cloud condensation nuclei spectra and aerosol particles on a south‐north transect of the Indian OceanJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2000
- CCN measurements during ACE-2 and their relationship to cloud microphysical propertiesTellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 2000
- TRMM observed first direct evidence of smoke from forest fires inhibiting rainfallGeophysical Research Letters, 1999
- A new instrument for measuring cloud condensation nuclei: Cloud condensation nucleus “remover”Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1998
- Comparison of directly measured CCN with CCN modeled from the number‐size distribution in the marine boundary layer during ACE 1 at Cape Grim, TasmaniaJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1998
- Aerosol observations at Chebogue Point during the 1993 North Atlantic Regional Experiment: Relationships among cloud condensation nuclei, size distribution, and chemistryJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1996