Possibilities and limitations of weighted averaging
- 1 October 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Biological Cybernetics
- Vol. 52 (6) , 409-416
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00449599
Abstract
A statistical analysis of a weighted averaging procedure for the estimation of small signals buried in noise (Hoke et al. 1984a) is given. The weighting factor used by this method is in inverse proportion to the variance estimated for the noise. It is shown that, compred to conventional averaging, weighted averaging can improve the signal-to-noise ratio to a high extent if the variance of the noise changes as a function of time. On the other hand, uncritical application of the method involves the danger that the signal amplitude is underestimated. How serious this effect is depends on the number of degrees of freedom available for the estimation of the weighting factor. The effect can be neglected, if this number is sufficiently increased by means of an appropriate preprocessing.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison between Simultaneously Recorded Auditory-Evoked Magnetic Fields and Potentials Elicited by Ipsilateral, Contralateral and Binaural Tone Burst StimulationInternational Journal of Audiology, 1986
- Analysis of the Electromagnetic Signals of the Human Brain: Milestones, Obstacles, and GoalsIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1984
- Weighted averaging — theory and application to electric response audiometryElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1984
- Time- and Intensity-Dependent Low-Pass Filtering of Auditory Brain Stem ResponsesInternational Journal of Audiology, 1984
- Some criteria for the estimation of evoked potentialsBiological Cybernetics, 1983
- A posteriori time-varying filtering of averaged evoked potentialsBiological Cybernetics, 1981
- Characterization of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signalsMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 1967