Time Series Analysis of Knowledge of Results Effects during Motor Skill Acquisition
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
- Vol. 62 (1) , 10-17
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1991.10607513
Abstract
Time series analysis was used to investigate the hypothesis that during acquisition of a motor skill, knowledge of results (KR) information is used to generate a stable internal referent about which response errors are randomly distributed. Sixteen subjects completed 50 acquisition trials of each of three movements whose spatial-temporal characteristics differed. Acquisition trials were either blocked, with each movement being presented in series, or randomized, with the presentation of movements occurring in random order. Analysis of movement time data indicated the contextual interference effect reported in previous studies was replicated in the present experiment. Time series analysis of the acquisition trial data revealed the majority of individual subject response patterns during blocked trials were best described by a model with a temporarily stationary, internal reference of the criterion and systematic, trial-to-trial variation of response errors. During random trial conditions, response patterns were usually best described by a “White-noise” model. This model predicts a permanently stationary, internal reference associated with randomly distributed response errors that are unaffected by KR information. These results are not consistent with previous work using time series analysis to describe motor behavior (Spray & Newell, 1986).Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time series analysis of motor learning: KR versus No-KRHuman Movement Science, 1986
- Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal.Psychological Bulletin, 1984
- A Closed-Loop Theory of Motor LearningJournal of Motor Behavior, 1971
- Retention of simple motor skills as a function of type of knowledge of results.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1962