Prognostic Value of Computerized Tomography Scan Characteristics in Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from The IMPACT Study
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Neurotrauma
- Vol. 24 (2) , 303-314
- https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2006.0033
Abstract
Computerized tomography (CT) scanning provides an objective assessment of the structural damage to the brain following traumatic brain injury (TBI). We aimed to describe and quantify the relationship between CT characteristics and 6-month outcome, assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Individual patient data from the IMPACT database were available on CT classification (N = 5209), status of basal cisterns ( N = 3861), shift ( N = 4698), traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) ( N = 7407), and intracranial lesions ( N = 7613). We used binary logistic and proportional odds regression for prognostic analyses. The CT classification was strongly related to outcome, with worst outcome for patients with diffuse injuries in CT class III (swelling; OR 2.50; CI 2.09-3.0) or CT class IV (shift; OR 3.03; CI 2.12-4.35). The prognosis in patients with mass lesions was better for patients with an epidural hematoma (OR 0.64; CI 0.56-0.72) and poorer for an acute subdural hematoma (OR 2.14; CI 1.87-2.45). Partial obliteration of the basal cisterns (OR 2.45; CI 1.88-3.20), tSAH (OR 2.64; CI 2.42-2.89), or midline shift (1-5 mm-OR 1.36; CI 1.09-1.68); >5 mm-OR 2.20; CI 1.64-2.96) were strongly related to poorer outcome. Discrepancies were found between the scoring of basal cisterns/shift and the CT classification, indicating observer variation. These were less marked in studies that had used a central review process. Multivariable analysis indicated that individual CT characteristics added substantially to the prognostic value of the CT classification alone. We conclude that both the CT classification and individual CT characteristics are important predictors of outcome in TBI. For clinical trials, a central review process is advocated to minimize observer variability in CT assessment.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Approaches to The Univariate Prognostic Analysis of The IMPACT Database on Traumatic Brain InjuryJournal of Neurotrauma, 2007
- Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and Validation of a Prognostic Score Based on Admission CharacteristicsJournal of Neurotrauma, 2005
- Multiple intracranial lesions in head injury: Clinical considerations, prognostic factors, management, and results in 95 patientsSurgical Neurology, 2001
- Computed Tomography of the Brain in Predicting Outcome of Traumatic Intracranial Haemorrhage in Malaysian PatientsActa Neurochirurgica, 2001
- CT prognostic factors in acute subdural haematomas: the value of the 'worst' CT scanBritish Journal Of Neurosurgery, 2000
- Sequential computerized tomography changes and related final outcome in severe head injury patientsActa Neurochirurgica, 1997
- The abbreviated injury scale as a predictor of outcome of severe head injuryIntensive Care Medicine, 1995
- Changes of Brainstem and Perimesencephalic CisternThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1995
- Quantification of midline shift as a predictor of poor outcome following head injurySurgical Neurology, 1991
- Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injuryJournal of Neurosurgery, 1981